<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Tech Ramblings from a Rainier Day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:59:43 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by Vista Synchronization Errors &#171; The Balesgroup Business and Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Vista Synchronization Errors &#171; The Balesgroup Business and Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-28</guid>
		<description>[...] Fortunately after Googling several different keywords, I found this gem that described my situation to a T http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors.. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fortunately after Googling several different keywords, I found this gem that described my situation to a T <a href="http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors."  rel="nofollow">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors.</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by David Wolfrom</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolfrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-27</guid>
		<description>Glad to have helped! I think it&#039;s the Broadcom drivers.

It&#039;s also an issue on Windows 7 using the Dell based Broadcom drivers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to have helped! I think it&#8217;s the Broadcom drivers.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also an issue on Windows 7 using the Dell based Broadcom drivers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by Jeff Bales</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-26</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Bales</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-26</guid>
		<description>I spent hours searching down syncing issues with a customer that recently switched from XP Pro to Vista Business with SBS 2003, and found your posting. It worked.  Thanks for posting!

I also have a customer that is having sporadic file saving error messages that appear to be locking related.  I had him change it to a &#039;0&#039; and I hope it solves his problems.  

Coincidentally, they all have Dell laptops, desktops and servers.  I wonder if Dell is the only one that configures Vista with locking enabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I spent hours searching down syncing issues with a customer that recently switched from XP Pro to Vista Business with SBS 2003, and found your posting. It worked.  Thanks for posting!</p>
<p>I also have a customer that is having sporadic file saving error messages that appear to be locking related.  I had him change it to a &#8216;0&#8242; and I hope it solves his problems.  </p>
<p>Coincidentally, they all have Dell laptops, desktops and servers.  I wonder if Dell is the only one that configures Vista with locking enabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Beta: Encountered an Assertion Failure by David Wolfrom</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2009/01/10/windows-7-beta-encountered-an-assertion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolfrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:11:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=14#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Looks like others have seen a corrupted build be the problem.  I also got mine from technet.

http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/1498-problems-installing-64-bit-version.html#post14127</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like others have seen a corrupted build be the problem.  I also got mine from technet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/1498-problems-installing-64-bit-version.html#post14127" onclick="javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview('/outbound/comment/http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/1498-problems-installing-64-bit-version.html#post14127');" rel="nofollow">http://www.sevenforums.com/general-discussion/1498-problems-installing-64-bit-version.html#post14127</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Beta: Encountered an Assertion Failure by David Wolfrom</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2009/01/10/windows-7-beta-encountered-an-assertion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolfrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 17:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=14#comment-18</guid>
		<description>Let us know what type of machine you have.  Perhaps we can narrow it down to a specific driver.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us know what type of machine you have.  Perhaps we can narrow it down to a specific driver.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Beta: Encountered an Assertion Failure by Ethan</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2009/01/10/windows-7-beta-encountered-an-assertion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>Ethan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:49:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=14#comment-17</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve got the same issue. I just installed build 7000 and I&#039;m getting these errors all over the place: avg.com, Microsoft Management Console, Add Gadgets window, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve got the same issue. I just installed build 7000 and I&#8217;m getting these errors all over the place: avg.com, Microsoft Management Console, Add Gadgets window, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Windows 7 Beta: Encountered an Assertion Failure by LenH</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2009/01/10/windows-7-beta-encountered-an-assertion-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>LenH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 06:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=14#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Reproducible for me, too. Sucks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reproducible for me, too. Sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by David Wolfrom</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>David Wolfrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-15</guid>
		<description>The initial problem was that no offline files were being made available to Vista clients.  Sounds like it&#039;s different than the one you are having.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The initial problem was that no offline files were being made available to Vista clients.  Sounds like it&#8217;s different than the one you are having.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by Marek</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Marek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-14</guid>
		<description>What was your initial problem here you were trying to defeat?
I have a Vista PC that Offline files is indeed working on, however if changes are made to an existing document, then they happen to the cached file and aren&#039;t updated until a manual (or auto) sync. If the file is open on another PC, they are not advised, suggesting that is happening from the cache too.
Any ideas?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What was your initial problem here you were trying to defeat?<br />
I have a Vista PC that Offline files is indeed working on, however if changes are made to an existing document, then they happen to the cached file and aren&#8217;t updated until a manual (or auto) sync. If the file is open on another PC, they are not advised, suggesting that is happening from the cache too.<br />
Any ideas?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista Synchronization Errors by Daryl</title>
		<link>http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/2008/06/25/vista-synchronization-errors/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.rainiernetworks.com/?p=3#comment-9</guid>
		<description>To be honest, I am not sure which one will take precedence. The MRXSmb-DisableOpslock tells the client either to request or not request opslock when accessing a shared file. The LanmanWorkstation handles the clients request from what I have gathered during my research.

If the registry key is not present then the setting it represents is enabled by default. In case of DisableOpslock, it&#039;s disabled (0)

In my case both keys were present and set to disabled. 

Also from what I gathered the keys (DisableOpslock and EnableOpslock) are not present by default</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be honest, I am not sure which one will take precedence. The MRXSmb-DisableOpslock tells the client either to request or not request opslock when accessing a shared file. The LanmanWorkstation handles the clients request from what I have gathered during my research.</p>
<p>If the registry key is not present then the setting it represents is enabled by default. In case of DisableOpslock, it&#8217;s disabled (0)</p>
<p>In my case both keys were present and set to disabled. </p>
<p>Also from what I gathered the keys (DisableOpslock and EnableOpslock) are not present by default</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
